Overlay
Let's talk

Hello!

Don’t Let Your Product Ruin Your Brand

It’s a tale as old as time. You can’t sell product without a brand; you can’t sell brand without a product. Product designers and brand designers are sometimes viewed as adversarial disciplines, but in truth, both sides are working toward the same goal with different tools. But what’s the right balance? And how can you get the best of both worlds? To begin, a bit of level-setting.

Product Designers

Product design is commonly defined as the approach to building a new product from start to finish. This encompasses market research, identifying problems, product development, designing informed solutions—and everything in between. It is a practice that values analytics, speed, efficiency, and multiple iterations, so it should come as no surprise that the role of product designers has exploded in the age of startups. Most of the time, product designers are working with an established toolkit and experimenting with how best to implement it.

Consider this clip from The Founder wherein they mockup a version of a McDonald’s kitchen on a tennis court. The way they are thinking about design is decidedly not about how it will make customers or employees feel when entering the restaurant, it is about what levers can be tweaked to create a burger in thirty seconds.

“While every project is different, there is a paint-by-numbers approach to the visuals that can happen in product design,” says Senior Designer Jonathan Haggard. “It tends to be very mathematical and results-driven to get to the design. Deciding a color works because it signifies a specific goal which can be tested. Technically, you can be a fantastic product designer and still have an unappealing aesthetic.”

As outlined by the UX Collective, the main tasks of a product designer are to:

– Define different scenarios and build interaction patterns
– Use tools that help them study user behavior (UX)
– Create interface prototypes (UI) and create the logic of the product with wireframes
– Pose and analyze different tests (A/B) to verify that this is the best product that can be offered
– Transfer the status and needs of the product to the Product Manager

Brand Designers

Creating a brand, on the other hand, is a completely different story. In the words of Seth Godin, a brand is “the set of expectations, memories, stories, and relationships that, taken together, account for a consumer’s decision to choose one product or service over another.” Whereas brand may once have been confined to a logo, it now extends on-and-offline to encompass visual identity, photography, video, copywriting, events, experiences, and behaviors. The tall order of brand designing is constituting a system that can hold all of these different elements and form an identity that not only feels right for today, but is flexible enough to grow for tomorrow. By definition, brand designers will not have analytics for every decision and there is an element of risk in decision making.

Action vs. Reaction

To be clear, companies need stellar product and brand design. But in the age of analytics and big data, when it has never been easier to make every single decision a numbers game, we argue that companies have over-indexed on product design thinking. If you’re always reacting to analytics, it’s incredibly difficult to surprise, provoke, or differentiate yourself because you’re letting what’s there dictate what could be.

There is a video from 2006 that still gets passed around between designers. It asks the simple question: What if Microsoft designed the iPod?

“The fact is that great design is a mix of art and science, and in a world run by product, where is the art?” asks Creative Director Thomas Hutchings. “Results and testing are incredibly important, but they will lead you to familiarity. If you want to pave the way for new thinking, you need an element of risk—you have to resist the urge to test everything and be comfortable with the fact that ground-breaking stuff may be poorly received at first.”

“The tricky thing about product design is that it is all about patterns, without necessarily an investigation of whether those patterns are good or bad,” continues Jonathan Haggard. “If you make a change to the pattern, some product designers will ask, ‘Does Google or Apple do that?’ It’s a fair question, but that’s not how you break the mold. That is the mold.”

Stay Weird

In a perfect world, you adopt best practices without losing your appetite for risk. Because while business is, of course, a business, there will always be an unquantifiable element of art, of storytelling, of magic that brings it all together and elevates your rational strategies to a higher emotional plane. You can’t get there by brain alone. You need heart.

In his great article, “When Product Design and Brand Join Forces,” Rob Goldin says, “Often as product designers, we develop such a deep empathy for customer needs, fears, and desires, that it can become a natural extension of our thinking from product requirements to emotional brand attributes.”

And that’s the ticket right there. A willingness to blend the rational and the emotional, the analytical and the unknown to create something larger than the sum of its parts.

Emotive Brand is a brand strategy and design agency in Oakland, California.

Emotive Brand’s Take on the iPhone X Design: Color Us Skeptical

iPhone X: Revolutionary or Not

We’re a design studio, so it’s a given that Emotive Brand people are Apple fanboys. We followed the iPhone X launch enthusiastically and our collective hearts beat a little faster when Tim Cook announced the most revolutionary new product since the first iPhone hit the market.

But as iPhone X’s new features were revealed, the collective air went out of the team — not just for the product, but also a bit for the Apple brand. The product definitely struck us as evolutionary, not revolutionary. And a brand that is beloved for over-delivering needs to be extra careful about over-promising.

Apple, we tell you this with love. We know that your innovations are designed to be so forward-looking that it can take people awhile to catch up. Maybe that will be true for us with the iPhone X. Maybe time and eventual usage will make us eat our words.

But at this point, we feel the iPhone X sacrifices too much for the sake of appearing bleeding edge. We’re marketers, but we still don’t like it when it feels like our favorite tech lifestyle company puts marketing ahead of product. As brand people, this makes us worry about one of our favorite companies.

It’s early days for this phone, but here is our perspective on both the hardware design and the user experience design of the iPhone X.

Inelegant Bump-Out

The “revolutionary” edge-to-edge glass (which Samsung has offered for awhile) does provide a bigger screen, and that’s great. But the camera bump-out at the top is inelegant and, worse, gets in the way of content playing on the phone.

We actually prefer the look of a straight frame at the top of the phone, even if it makes the screen minimally smaller. And compromising the viewership experience for the sake of making an edge-to-edge glass claim seems to put marketing ahead of function.

Touch ID Versus Facial Recognition

We love touch ID. You can use it in the dark, in your car, no matter what you’re doing. We’re dubious about facial recognition. What if we’re driving and need to quickly access a map? Will the iPhone X really recognize our face when we check email first thing in the morning, with head half smooshed into the pillow and only one eye open? TouchID can handle those scenarios.

Matt Burns of TechCrunch says this is a deal killer for him. He says Apple tried putting the TouchID sensor on glass, but “couldn’t pull off the trick.” Many Android phones put the sensor on the back, but Apple decided to leave it off.

Security is another compromise. “Apple always wants its user experience to be delightful,” says security expert Marc Rogers in Wired. “In the security world that means you’re going to have to accept certain limitations.”

Again, this strikes us as a sacrifice of form over function akin to other Apple decisions like the elimination of a headphone jack from iPhone 7, forcing the use of wireless earbuds. We hope we’re wrong, but facial recognition seems like a questionable fix for something that already works really well.

$1,000+ Pricetag

Given our skepticism about the key new features of the iPhone X, none of us are planning to run out and plunk down $1,000+ for it. Of course, the sheer beauty of the device might make us reach for our wallets when we see it in person, but given that about 80 percent of iPhone owners use a case, $1,000 is a lot to pay for beauty that you then cover up.

Emotive Brand is a San Francisco Brand Strategy and Design and Agency.